<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Progressive Wednesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.progressivewednesday.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com</link>
	<description>To dos, talk and tools to get America over the hump.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fixing Elections (in a Good Way) by democracyadvocate</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2008/02/13/fixing-elections-in-a-good-way/comment-page-1/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>democracyadvocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/02/21/fixing-elections-in-a-good-way/#comment-6175</guid>
		<description>Great to keep after these issues -- we are entering a period of great opportunity for change.

The National Popular Vote plan (www.nationalpopularvote.com) is really starting to move -- passed two states, and poised to move in others. Instant runoff voting (www.instantrunoff.com), keeps winning and working well in city after city and is now being debated for states. Election day registration  (www.demos.org) won in Iowa, public financing (www.publicampaign.org) won in Connecticut and there&#039;s growing support for a constitutional right to vote.

Keep in touch on all this with groups like Common Cause, FairVote, Demos, Public Campaign and more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to keep after these issues &#8212; we are entering a period of great opportunity for change.</p>
<p>The National Popular Vote plan (www.nationalpopularvote.com) is really starting to move &#8212; passed two states, and poised to move in others. Instant runoff voting (www.instantrunoff.com), keeps winning and working well in city after city and is now being debated for states. Election day registration  (www.demos.org) won in Iowa, public financing (www.publicampaign.org) won in Connecticut and there&#8217;s growing support for a constitutional right to vote.</p>
<p>Keep in touch on all this with groups like Common Cause, FairVote, Demos, Public Campaign and more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Wednesday: No, Guns Do Kill People by millerrdm</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/10/03/this-wednesday-no-guns-do-kill-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>millerrdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/10/03/this-wednesday-no-guns-do-kill-people/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>Professor Gary Kleck of Florida State University has provided the best answer to this. An award-winning expert on crime, Prof. Kleck has conducted extensive survey research to measure firearms ownership and use in America. He found that firearms were used as often as 2.5 million times a year for protection--three to five times more often, he says, than they are used for criminal purposes. In the vast majority of these protective cases, the gun is not fired.
Kleck, Gary, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter, 1991.

The truth is that in the past seventy years, while the U.S. population has more than doubled and the number of firearms owned by Americans has gone up five times, fatal firearm accidents have been cut by 76%. The most important factor in reducing firearms accidents is proper education on the safe handling and storage of firearms

Firearms accidents can always be reduced further, but their numbers are far below many other common mishaps including drownings, falls and poisonings. Gun accidents account for only 0.7% of accidental deaths.

The Militia Act of 1792, adopted the year after the Second Amendment was ratified, declared that the Militia of the United States (members of the militia who had to serve if called upon by the government) included all able-bodied adult males. The National Guard was not established until 1903. In 1920 it was designated one part of the &quot;Militia of the United States.&quot; The other part included other able-bodied adult men, plus some other men and women

The Freedmen&#039;s Bureau Act of 1866 was enacted to protect the rights of freed slaves to keep and bear arms following the Civil War and at the outset of the chaotic Reconstruction period. The act declared protection for the &quot;full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and . . . estate . . . including the constitutional right to bear arms. . . .&quot;

The Property Requisition Act of 1941 was intended to reassure Americans that preparations for war would not include repressive or tyrannical policies against firearms owners. It was passed shortly before the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, which led the United States into World War II. The act declared that it would not &quot;authorize the requisitioning or require the registration of any firearms possessed by any individual for his personal protection or sport,&quot; or &quot;to impair or infringe in any manner the right of any individual to keep and bear arms. . . .&quot;

The two more recent laws sought to reverse excesses involving America&#039;s legal system. In the Firearms Owners&#039; Protection Act of 1986, Congress reacted to overzealous enforcement policies under the federal firearms law: &quot;The Congress finds that the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms under the second amendment to the United States Constitution; to security against illegal and unreasonable searches and seizures under the fourth amendment; against uncompensated taking of property, double jeopardy, and assurance of due process of law under the fifth amendment; and against unconstitutional exercise of authority under the ninth and tenth amendments; require additional legislation to correct existing firearms statutes and enforcement policies. . . .&quot;

If the government takes the guns from law abidding citizens what rights are they going to take next?  freedom of press, assebmly, or fair trial; for all the criminals who manage to have guns any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Gary Kleck of Florida State University has provided the best answer to this. An award-winning expert on crime, Prof. Kleck has conducted extensive survey research to measure firearms ownership and use in America. He found that firearms were used as often as 2.5 million times a year for protection&#8211;three to five times more often, he says, than they are used for criminal purposes. In the vast majority of these protective cases, the gun is not fired.<br />
Kleck, Gary, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter, 1991.</p>
<p>The truth is that in the past seventy years, while the U.S. population has more than doubled and the number of firearms owned by Americans has gone up five times, fatal firearm accidents have been cut by 76%. The most important factor in reducing firearms accidents is proper education on the safe handling and storage of firearms</p>
<p>Firearms accidents can always be reduced further, but their numbers are far below many other common mishaps including drownings, falls and poisonings. Gun accidents account for only 0.7% of accidental deaths.</p>
<p>The Militia Act of 1792, adopted the year after the Second Amendment was ratified, declared that the Militia of the United States (members of the militia who had to serve if called upon by the government) included all able-bodied adult males. The National Guard was not established until 1903. In 1920 it was designated one part of the &#8220;Militia of the United States.&#8221; The other part included other able-bodied adult men, plus some other men and women</p>
<p>The Freedmen&#8217;s Bureau Act of 1866 was enacted to protect the rights of freed slaves to keep and bear arms following the Civil War and at the outset of the chaotic Reconstruction period. The act declared protection for the &#8220;full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings concerning personal liberty, personal security, and . . . estate . . . including the constitutional right to bear arms. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>The Property Requisition Act of 1941 was intended to reassure Americans that preparations for war would not include repressive or tyrannical policies against firearms owners. It was passed shortly before the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, which led the United States into World War II. The act declared that it would not &#8220;authorize the requisitioning or require the registration of any firearms possessed by any individual for his personal protection or sport,&#8221; or &#8220;to impair or infringe in any manner the right of any individual to keep and bear arms. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>The two more recent laws sought to reverse excesses involving America&#8217;s legal system. In the Firearms Owners&#8217; Protection Act of 1986, Congress reacted to overzealous enforcement policies under the federal firearms law: &#8220;The Congress finds that the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms under the second amendment to the United States Constitution; to security against illegal and unreasonable searches and seizures under the fourth amendment; against uncompensated taking of property, double jeopardy, and assurance of due process of law under the fifth amendment; and against unconstitutional exercise of authority under the ninth and tenth amendments; require additional legislation to correct existing firearms statutes and enforcement policies. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>If the government takes the guns from law abidding citizens what rights are they going to take next?  freedom of press, assebmly, or fair trial; for all the criminals who manage to have guns any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Wednesday: No, Guns Do Kill People by millerrdm</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/10/03/this-wednesday-no-guns-do-kill-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>millerrdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/10/03/this-wednesday-no-guns-do-kill-people/#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>Homicide of 0-19 years is 1,844 in 2003, 151 were unintentional, thats two totally different numbers in the way these kids were killed. Motor vehicle deaths were 7,677 should we not drive with our kids? Drowning-1,062, Suffocation/Strangulation-910, Poisoning-650, Fire/Burn-551, why do people only look at one aspect of how children die? Thats why we call them accidents as unfortunate as they may be. I agree 100% if there wasnt a gun it may not have happened but that is 100% at the fault of the irresponsible parent which i may add 14,364 deaths is due to perinatal conditions. If Cho Seung-Hui killed 29 people with a kitchen knife think people would try to take them from us? A gun, like a knife, a bat, a pipe is only a tool if used immproperly can be leathol. Its the sick person that diffenatly had a problem before he got a gun. I doubt he picked up a gun one day and said &quot;hey, i think i mite go kill someone today&quot;. Saying guns kill people is like blaming misspelled words on my pencil. Dont get me wrong, i am all for gun control just not taking them totally away. I keep them in a safe and locked up from my child, she has more of a chance getting a respiratory disease then shooting herself. People have killed others long before guns and will continue to invent more distructive ways to do it. Guns dont kill people, people kill people, Knives dont kill people, people kill people, Shovels dont kill people, people kill people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homicide of 0-19 years is 1,844 in 2003, 151 were unintentional, thats two totally different numbers in the way these kids were killed. Motor vehicle deaths were 7,677 should we not drive with our kids? Drowning-1,062, Suffocation/Strangulation-910, Poisoning-650, Fire/Burn-551, why do people only look at one aspect of how children die? Thats why we call them accidents as unfortunate as they may be. I agree 100% if there wasnt a gun it may not have happened but that is 100% at the fault of the irresponsible parent which i may add 14,364 deaths is due to perinatal conditions. If Cho Seung-Hui killed 29 people with a kitchen knife think people would try to take them from us? A gun, like a knife, a bat, a pipe is only a tool if used immproperly can be leathol. Its the sick person that diffenatly had a problem before he got a gun. I doubt he picked up a gun one day and said &#8220;hey, i think i mite go kill someone today&#8221;. Saying guns kill people is like blaming misspelled words on my pencil. Dont get me wrong, i am all for gun control just not taking them totally away. I keep them in a safe and locked up from my child, she has more of a chance getting a respiratory disease then shooting herself. People have killed others long before guns and will continue to invent more distructive ways to do it. Guns dont kill people, people kill people, Knives dont kill people, people kill people, Shovels dont kill people, people kill people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clergyman Charlie: On Social Sins by Shadedpain4</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/07/29/clergyman-charlie-on-social-sins/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadedpain4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/07/29/clergyman-charlie-on-social-sins/#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Really good column, thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good column, thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clergyman Charlie: On Adam and Eve by Shadedpain4</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/08/12/clergyman-charlie-on-adam-and-eve/comment-page-1/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadedpain4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/08/12/clergyman-charlie-on-adam-and-eve/#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>Ive never understood why this was such an issue. The Bible doesnt chronicle every detail of every event that man or God has ever experienced, so why do the events in the Bible always get treated as if they do? Just because the Bible only tells us of the creation of Adam and Eve, why is it so unthinkable that God created, in the same fashion, many other people?

&quot;There wasn&#039;t an Adam: there is just you&quot; is awfully slippery slope, ending with &quot;There wasn&#039;t a Jesus: there is just you&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive never understood why this was such an issue. The Bible doesnt chronicle every detail of every event that man or God has ever experienced, so why do the events in the Bible always get treated as if they do? Just because the Bible only tells us of the creation of Adam and Eve, why is it so unthinkable that God created, in the same fashion, many other people?</p>
<p>&#8220;There wasn&#8217;t an Adam: there is just you&#8221; is awfully slippery slope, ending with &#8220;There wasn&#8217;t a Jesus: there is just you&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

