<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviving Niagara: Sign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/</link>
	<description>To dos, talk and tools to get America over the hump.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Seventy case studies from 11 countries and the opinions of over 200 transport  professionals world-wide disprove the statements that displaced traffic will simply divert  to neighboring streets, clogging them, leading to worse traffic problems.      

In summary, the studies found that â€œwell-designed and well-implemented schemes to reallocate road space improves conditions for pedestrians and cyclists without increasing  congestion or other related problems.     

The studies listed benefits: air-quality improvements, reduced neighborhood severance,  increased business investment, more attractive living and working conditions, and  improved retail vitality.     

The potential opportunities achieved are traffic reduction, urban regeneration, more  efficient use of economic and scenic resources and other national policy objectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seventy case studies from 11 countries and the opinions of over 200 transport  professionals world-wide disprove the statements that displaced traffic will simply divert  to neighboring streets, clogging them, leading to worse traffic problems.      </p>
<p>In summary, the studies found that â€œwell-designed and well-implemented schemes to reallocate road space improves conditions for pedestrians and cyclists without increasing  congestion or other related problems.     </p>
<p>The studies listed benefits: air-quality improvements, reduced neighborhood severance,  increased business investment, more attractive living and working conditions, and  improved retail vitality.     </p>
<p>The potential opportunities achieved are traffic reduction, urban regeneration, more  efficient use of economic and scenic resources and other national policy objectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I actually believe that this would have a more positive impact than negative. Rerouting traffic through the city instead of around it would be better for small businesses, and any environmental impact would be more than cancelled out by the new vegetation. There will be a very small impact on traffic elsewhere, as there are even several other routes than commuters can take: Hyde Park, Highland, I-190, Lewiston Road, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually believe that this would have a more positive impact than negative. Rerouting traffic through the city instead of around it would be better for small businesses, and any environmental impact would be more than cancelled out by the new vegetation. There will be a very small impact on traffic elsewhere, as there are even several other routes than commuters can take: Hyde Park, Highland, I-190, Lewiston Road, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plynch</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>plynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressivewednesday.com/2007/06/13/reviving-niagara-sign/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m torn on this one.  I fully support the naturalization of the gorge area.  Niagara Partnership is to be commended for their persistence.  However- an issue of concern is the rerouting of traffic through residential neighborhoods - and the resultant concentration of traffic and fuel exhaust in those neighborhoods.  That is an unintended consequence of an otherwise noble cause.  How can we mitigate this negative impact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn on this one.  I fully support the naturalization of the gorge area.  Niagara Partnership is to be commended for their persistence.  However- an issue of concern is the rerouting of traffic through residential neighborhoods &#8211; and the resultant concentration of traffic and fuel exhaust in those neighborhoods.  That is an unintended consequence of an otherwise noble cause.  How can we mitigate this negative impact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

